• About the Author
  • Books
  • Vinyl
  • What the critics say about Jeff

Jeff Halperin

Jeff Halperin

Author Archives: jdhalperin

Prediction: the Toronto Maple Leafs Will Win All 82 Regular Season Games

16 Sunday Oct 2011

Posted by jdhalperin in Comedy, Sports

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

NHL hockey, Ottawa Senators, Phil Kessel, Toronto Maple Leafs

Is any NHL team capable of beating the Toronto Maple Leafs? After last night’s game, the answer is a resounding “no,” as the Leafs have proven that they can win in every way situation: shutout domination; annihilating their opponent, then barely hanging on; the come from behind victory.  This edition of the Leafs is literally unstoppable.

The defence has been poised and fearless, readily entering into the offensive attack while managing to scare the daylights out of opposing forwards, particularly those from France.  Woody Allen said 90% of life was just showing up: thanks to Phil Kessel, this is true for our other forwards.  I could describe Kessel’s domination by comparing his speed to Mogilny or his exploits to Achilles, but the damage he’s wrought to opponents is recorded authoritatively by the league statisticians: Phil leads the NHL in goals, points, and plus minus (a distinction shared with Phaneuf, that ransacking enthusiast).  Doubly impressive, Kessel’s managing to do all this with only one testicle.

The Maple Leafs are undefeated both at home (3-0-0) and on the road (0-0-0). At this rate, statistically speaking, we are heading for a perfect 82 win season. This would definitely be a triumph for a team that has failed to make the playoffs since the lockout. But in my opinion there will be doubters: “Reimer will suffer the sophomore jinx” (nah, he prays successfully to Jesus all the time); “Kessel is streaky and he’ll have another fourteen game slump” (no he won’t, how dare you!); “Bozak is a third line centre on your first line” (he’s been improving his faceoffs all summer…); “wait, you’ve only played three games” (hardly the leafs’ fault).  Be assured, these critics, depraved Senator fans, know nothing about hockey: they’re fans of a team who passed on a young Chris Pronger (prototypical defensive bully), Paul Kariya (989 pts), Jason Arnott (907 pts), preferring Daigle instead (umm…ya).  We’ve beat them four times in four playoffs. Currently sitting 1-4, the Sens have no shot at a perfect season like us.  Leaf doubters of this variety and others can all be thoroughly ignored.

But it must be said, we’re not out of the woods just yet. A bigger question remains to be seen: can the momentum from mission 82W carry over to Mission 16W?

As ever, we have no reason for doubt.

In Defence of Don Cherry

13 Thursday Oct 2011

Posted by jdhalperin in Sports, Statements

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

concussions, Don Cherry, NHL player's safety

So much simplistic reductionism has been used to support or malign Don Cherry during his latest brouhaha. Ardent supporters of old-school tough guy hockey are behind opposing trenches against modern day ‘we juuuuust learned about concussions,’ firing generalizations at one another without really addressing Cherry’s actual stance.  To be clear, Cherry blamed three ex-fighters for denouncing fighting, calling them (in classic parlance) “pukes,” “turncoats,” and “hypocrites.”  This was factually wrong of him, because only one of the three actually wanted to ban fighting.  He should have apologized for making a mistake.  The players are considering legal action and have hinted they want his Coach’s Corner segment to end, saying it’s behind the times.  The subtext is, it’s not only this incident but his approach to the game that enables vicious, dangerous hockey, and it’s time for him to go.  But the truth is, despite his reputation is as a supporter of hockey as a primitive blood-sport, hardly anyone has done more to advance safety in the game as Don Cherry.  Paradoxically, this tendency has existed alongside his brazen endorsement of fighting, but only a certain kind of fighting, as we’ll see.

In the mid 90s, Cherry took up many causes to keep NHL players safe that are only now coming into vogue: smaller elbow pads that can’t be used as weapons; starting a campaign designed to end hitting from behind doling out stop sign stickers on the backs of kids helmets, and denouncing it in the NHL; demanding no-touch icing after showing dozens of disturbing hits causing serious injuries as a result of a more-or-less useless aspect of the game.  As a kid, on his TV segment and movies, Cherry taught me how to absorb a body-check and how not to get hit from behind. People condemn the Rock Em Sock Em videos without acknowledging all the safety tips for kids that come afterwards. People are distracted (understandably) by his loud suits, and by the force of his on screen persona, but this doesn’t eliminate all the concern Cherry has shown for player’s safety. And finally, there’s a huge aspect of fighting he denounced that nobody gives him credit for.

There is a brand of fighter, a goon, that sits on the bench until he has to fight–the kind of guy with 3000 penalty minutes, 2 goals.  Cherry has unequivocally denounced this practice, citing his own experience as a bench-warmer as humiliating.  He said the fighters on his team when he coached were four twenty goal scorers.  In other words, fighting should be an organic part of the game, occurring when tensions run high because a code of the game is broken.  It shouldn’t be the routine farce it has become, where no-talent Goliaths schedule fights in advance to remain in the league and make a better salary than they otherwise would in a freak show.  Fighting should happen the way it does in other sports and in life: when people are actually mad.

When it comes to making observations about hockey (not politics, or life in general), nobody is more observant than Don Cherry.  He explains aspects of the sport that totally escape other so-called pundits, normally ex-players finally allowed to show personality.  Cherry enriches the game by making you appreciate little things.  Last week, he showed fighters carefully moving away from a puck before a fight, knowing they were liable to step on it and injure themselves. I watched the same play live but didn’t notice.  I thought the only threat of injury was an opponents fist.  He recently showed Max Pacioretty pushing/taunting Chara after scoring a goal (typical), whereas most people focused on Chara annihilating Pacioretty’s head into a scansion. He condoned the hit as a hockey play, rightly, but but he ripped into the Montreal arena for being dangerous, offered a simple, effective solution, and showed a string of identical hits that went without suspensions. His solution was comprehensive, taking the game and player’s safety into account.  The hit was shown hundreds of times, even on the national news, but nobody else shed light on what could have been one aspect of its real motivation.  Cherry sees a bird’s eye view, the total game, that comes from watching an incalculable amount of hockey (NHL, all junior levels and even below).

Those who make it sound like Cherry is opposed to player’s safety, that he’d deny the oncoming wave of science backing up the dangers of concussions because he’s essentially a caveman, are disingenuous at best, and I suspect most of them haven’t really watched him for years and see him as a one dimensional caricature.  When he gets his facts wrong, he should admit it, and I was surprised his apology was only half-hearted.  But his opinions on hockey still enrich the game as ever, and offer a refreshing, insightful perspective that never conforms to the newest, modish opinions on the game, some of which, his detractors never admit, he predicted years ago.

If he is effectively thrown out of his position over this quarrel,he’ll leave behind a gaping hole and hockey won’t be any safer.

Toronto Needs the Arts to Balance the Budget

11 Tuesday Oct 2011

Posted by jdhalperin in Politics

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Atwoodian Economics, J.D. Halperin, Rob Ford, the Grid, Toronto arts funding

Toronto is apparently suffering a deficit of over $700 million.  It might be interesting to consider that during the mayoral election nobody mentioned this shortfall, and that this crippling debt seems to have appeared from nowhere, yet dominates the budget.  But that’s a topic for another day. The fact is, the city is poised to stop funding frills in the name of austerity–no surprise, Ford’s sawed off shitgun is aiming straight for the arts.  Fuelling this is the assumption that anything enjoyable or soul-nourishing must be unaffordable–literally, Ford can’t afford it. Har har har.  But according to a visual graph from the Grid (the kind that unfortunately looks cute and has the undesired effect of not being taken seriously), far from a decadent expense, the arts is an economic engine.

Consider: Nuit Blanche got an initial investment of $600,000 and brought in $34.7 million; TIFF received $800,000 in grants this year and brought in $27 million in tourism from out of town visitors.  There’s no need to exhaust similar stats, the trend is clear: even accounting for exaggeration and faulty methods, the return is irresistible.  So why is it being resisted? Are these numbers that wrong?

As an innate sceptic, I find a return this crazy hard to swallow whole, but the graph is pretty compelling. Though admittedly I’m not an economics major, in my humble opinion it behooves our mayor to receive millions of dollars, especially when he’s searching desperately for every penny.  I know if I had millions of dollars coming at me on condition I suffer some art, I’d oblige. Hell, for millions I’d do all kinds of unmentionable things. But what I can’t ever imagine is being too poor to buy beers after refusing to be paid handsomely to watch Leaf games.  Is it possible our mayor hates art more than he loves money?

Unless the Grid’s numbers are a severe misrepresentation, the mayor is under heavy obligation to explain why a cherished and lucrative revenue stream is being cut while the belt is tightened all over the city.

Unqualified Teachers Abound

01 Saturday Oct 2011

Posted by jdhalperin in Statements

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Globe and Mail, Margaret Wente, OISE

Margaret Wente wrote a commendable opinion piece in the Globe and Mail (“Too Many Teacher’s Can’t Do Math, Let Alone Teach It,” September 29) bemoaning the alarming number of math teachers who are uncomfortable doing math themselves.  She blames the paltry amount of math courses needed to become qualified as a math teacher and the OISE pedagogy (the most influential teacher’s college in the country) that fails to prioritize education in favour of, “social justice and global inequality.” Wente is correct on both points.

Personally, I was shocked when I got accepted to OISE because I didn’t think I had sufficient History courses when I applied. (English was my primary teachable, which I majored in, but I thought I was at least one short for my secondary teachable).  I suspect I was accepted solely on the basis of the equity/racism essay I wrote in my application, as they’re the only school that required one and they’re the only school I got accepted to.  In other words, OISE had the magnanimity to look past my lack of requirements and see only my contrived essay I wrote to satisfy their predictable view of multiculturalism.  That school was a nightmare.  It turns out I shouldn’t have joined a club that would have me as a member.

OISE fails to recognize that setting unqualified teachers upon a country of innocent students is itself a social injustice. Wente describes the frustration of University professors from around the country who report that the math skills of students studying to become math teachers are “generally abysmal.”  This is obviously a crucial problem, but it’s compounded because the teacher training programs you’d expect to be concerned are more concerned with politics than education.  It’s like the police protesting a lawless society by encouraging rioters to find the biggest, most expensive TV to steal.

To be sure, a teacher is a part time social worker; they spend a huge chunk of time with kids who have real issues.  Teaching poor children who don’t eat breakfast, or who are abused by their parents, or bullied is extremely hard work, and there’s no shortages of other issues. But if you are so concerned with politics and society, become a politician.  What’s needed is concrete steps to help educate kids who suffer from inequalities, not constantly railing against them in some abstract way while failing to teach kids to read and write because the teachers don’t know how to themselves.

Every teacher’s college should subscribe to the following statement: “If you don’t know squat about what you teach it doesn’t matter how sympathetic you are to the plight of your students.” Any institution who disagrees with this final statement, in word or in action, has blood on its hands.

The Liberation of Chickens From Today’s Free-Range

30 Friday Sep 2011

Posted by jdhalperin in Comedy

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Free-Range Chickens, PETA

The literature and the images on PETA’s website about the deplorable way chickens suffer are beyond disturbing. The depraved details need not be retold: suffice it to say, it should come as no shock to learn Heinrich Himmler was once a chicken farmer. But today, even lucky chickens under the best conditions have a dull existence idling on a free range under the heavy surveillance of their executioner. Comparatively, free range is good, but we all know there’s more to life than mobility. Chickens need more. There’s a new, upscale market of pampered chickens waiting to be exploited.

In the future, allowing chickens merely free range outside will be considered a moral violation. Chickens will receive more and more perks until finally progressives will only buy eggs produced by chickens that have been on guided tours throughout Europe. This is undoubtedly more humane than any free range. How do you keep ‘em down on the farm after seeing Paree? Making nests and bathing in dust, those splendours of the free range, doesn’t hold up to gazing dreamily at the Tuscan countryside. Only after such pampering is the chicken ready for execution.  Eating what we kill is humane, so long as it’s taken to Italy first.  A dozen eggs will cost only $45.

This will change when progressives complain that only rich chickens who win the genetic lottery enjoy the privilege of travel. Meanwhile, lower class chickens languish in squalid, free-range ghettoes. Thankfully, they’ll point out, a full life does not require a huge purse.

These progressives will buy chickens that have been spiritually nurtured by enlightened farmers in ways that are inherently accessible. Each chicken will be personally named and fed by hand. If they’re lonely, farmers will curl up and cuddle. Paperback editions of world classics can commonly be found for under $5. Like children, chickens will love being read to. Movie projectors will screen classic cinema on the side of barns. Even if the deeper meaning is less than fully grasped, chickens will feel cared for. In other words, conscious consumerism will expand the definition of free range to include nurturing the chicken’s mind, body and soul. This is a free range.

Then, after farmers have ensured that every chicken has had a pleasant life on the road to self-actualization, they’ll kill them in their sleep and sell their bodies.

the Return of John Galliano

22 Thursday Sep 2011

Posted by jdhalperin in Statements

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

John Galliano, Kate Moss, Macleans

The current issue of Maclean’s reports that garish John Galliano, the high-profile anti-Semite and former fashion designer/icon, might be poised for a “resurrection.”  Cue the Rocky music, our hero’s returning.  A Parisian court found him guilty of “public insults based on origin, religious affiliation, race or ethnicity,”  a verdict that didn’t exactly require enhanced interrogation techniques to arrive at since Galliano was filmed professing his love for Hitler, and plaintiff Geraldine Bloch described separate occasions where Galliano remarked on her “dirty Jewish face.”  Possibly, just possibly, she had remnants of lunch on her Jewish face, but in case you were about to give Galliano the benefit of the doubt consider he called her a “‘dirty whore’ at least a thousand times” in a 45 minute rant.”  Even accounting for exaggeration that’s 22 times a minute, rounding down.  Thankfully for John, Paris has no law forbidding issuing insults based on sexual proclivity.  In any case, the judge let him off light: this incident will appear on his record (should somebody forget) and he only has to pay about an $8000 suspended sentence, meaning he pays nothing unless he offends again in the next five years.  He escaped a $30,000 fine and six month jail time, the maximum punishment for his offence.  The presiding judge noted the “values of respect and tolerance which the defendant generally adheres to,” of course notwithstanding his rapid- fire misogyny and drunken Jew bashing.

To be sure, I don’t agree that there ought to be a law forbidding saying what he said, as odious as it is.  It was obviously a detestable opinion, but it was not a call to violence. Of course the court of public opinion screwed him way harder by effectively dropping him from his high profile jobs, so the verdict in real court was irrelevant.  Whether the law should exist or not is a fair but separate question, but it does exist and he was undeniably very guilty.

Too often celebrities are expected to be good people, and when they publicly screw up the public is disappointed they weren’t better role models for the kids and pathetic adults who should know better.  People should be admired for their talents, but talented people shouldn’t be expected to be particularly virtuous.  Their talent has nothing to do with their morals.  I don’t like Wagner’s music, but unlike Woody Allen it doesn’t give me the urge to conquer Poland.  There’s a separation for me.  Likewise, I still enjoy listening to Thriller, and freely admit I hear the music and mute the sounds of protesting children.  So as disturbing as Galliano’s comments were, as long as he can put together a dress I can’t really blame Kate Moss for wearing his at her wedding.  Though the standing ovation Galliano garnered after Moss’s father thanked him seems excessively polite for my taste.

As of now, Galliano’s lawyer said his client’s mood is “serene, relieved and pleased this is all behind him.”  But some people have longer memories. Unfortunately the article failed to drudge up his most vile comments.  For the next five years, Galliano will make sure there’s no video camera around before he tells a woman, “I love Hitler and people like you would be dead.  Your mothers, your fathers would all be fucking gassed.”

Militant Left-Wingers Overburdening Young Children

16 Friday Sep 2011

Posted by jdhalperin in Politics, Statements

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

6 year old day planner, Jenny Peto, National Post, OISE, TDSB, Toronto Life

When I was six, nothing was more important to me than pizza, the Blue Jays, and X-men.  By certain contemporary standards, I was a selfish boy guilty of neglecting the plight of the marginalized.  The National Post reported Wednesday that a father was angered when he saw the calendar of his six year old son’s day planner.  December 17 was marked International Day to End Violence Against Sex Workers, Feb. 6 was International Day of Zero Tolerance against Genital Mutilation, and what would an equitable, inclusive day planner for infants be without a call for Palestinian solidarity?  The Toronto District School Board issues the planners at a cost of $10 each.  Today, the TDSB is dedicated to extinguishing the ever present danger of childhood innocence.

A spokeswoman for the TDSB, Shari Schwartz-Maltz, explains that the board uses several suppliers to make the planners, plus some planners have specific pages unique for individual schools, making it hard to know how many schools received this exact planner.  Couldn’t there be other planners running amok?  Infants elsewhere might be readying for “9/11 conspiracy day,” or something similarly inclusive and equitable, but I suspect there are no “days of significance” honouring Milton Friedman or Maynard Keynes, those heroes of capitalism.

In one breath, a professor of education at OISE (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education) named Kathleen Gallagher clearly identifies the problem, then defends it nonetheless: “…no educator wants to overburden a young child with difficulty that he or she is unequipped for, but at the same time I have to say with equal vehemence that sometimes these prompts provide an opportunity, however difficult, for parents and children to have important conversations.  And when it’s instituted in a calendar, it’s more likely that a child might ask their parents because walking around in the world, a child is going to encounter those ideas.”

The first part is lifted from Curb Your Enthusiasm when you say one thing before immediately negating it by saying “at the same time.” It’s less funny here.  To be a nitpicker, you can’t argue both something and its opposite “with equal vehemence”…it’s clear what she vehemently believes.  What’s really illustrative is her belief that six year old children require shielding from older kids on the playground who will inevitably talk about genital mutilation.  She confuses her hyper-political OISE world of urgent causes for the world surrounding a six year old child.  Kids only talk about genitals if they’re hit by a projectile, and that’s normally good for a laugh.

And Palestinian solidarity for six year olds?  Outrageous.  This supposes a highly partisan cause is universal, and even if it presented the issue in balanced terms, which of course it doesn’t, to discuss and learn about such a polarizing, complicated topic with kids so young is scandalously inappropriate.  Perhaps the TDSB and OISE’s Gallagher expect parents to compare and contrast Theodore Herzl and Edward Said for their six year olds?  This is standard issue from the school who awarded Jenny Peto a master’s degree for producing a rambling annotated autobiography.  This is no accident, it’s propaganda.  In another time and place, these children would be given machine guns and orders.  Having an “important discussion” like this with a six year old is designed to go horribly wrong.  Mommy, why do Jews love killing Arabs so much?  Like Dicaprio in Inception, they’re planting a very controversial idea in somebody’s unguarded mind.  Under the guise of enlightenment, militant lefties are brazenly and perniciously seeking to convert defenceless infants to their vile ranks.  This isn’t a noble but “difficult conversation,” it’s child abuse. And I’m not in the least surprised.

Reckless, radical progressives make pilgrimages to OISE en masse because, even though OISE dabbles in education, the “school” is merely a front for its true purpose as an activist haven.  During my year at OISE, I had a conversation with one of these humourless, disgruntled boors wherein he reduced Fifth Business, an internationally acclaimed novel about the way history is viewed, magic, and Jungian psychology, to a novel written by a dead white Christian man (I doubt it occurred to him that eventually he too would be a dead white Christian man). Immune to complexity, it never occurs to this species of philistine they can be mistaken, so they’re convinced they have a patent on morality.  In the same class, “Actively Educating for Social & Economic Justice,” a kindergarten teacher-to-be volunteered that he was perfectly willing to reveal his political beliefs to the infants in his class.  Politics in Kindergarten.  Nobody in the room batted an eyelash. There’s a scene in Lord of the Rings where the evil Saruman watches his demonic beasts being formed from the nether regions of hell to wage war on the innocent. Such is OISE forming their teachers.

The National Post points out that OISE and the TDSB are not alone.  The McGuinty government got heat last year for trying to introduce changes to the health education’s curriculum that would teach grade threes about homosexuality and grade sixes about masturbation—the latter a subject which, unlike say math or English, many students are autodidacts.  Jan Wong in October’s Toronto Life reports on the growing number of Toronto public schools (more than 200 of nearly 600) have gardens where kids learn to grow vegetables while one in five can’t pass the grade ten literacy test administered by the provincially funded Education Quality and Accountability Office. (As of publishing, sadly this interesting article wasn’t available online).  At this rate, believing school should have at least something to do with education will be seen as radical.

Help!

Getting Over 9/11

12 Monday Sep 2011

Posted by jdhalperin in Politics, Statements

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

9/11, Berlin, Germany, Mordecai Richler

Though I feel it’s necessary to acknowledge 9/11 in this space, with such an overwhelming amount of coverage I didn’t think I had anything to add. Then I considered my time in Berlin and Munich a couple years ago and got to thinking about xenophobia and the way we view history.

People wonder how to explain 9/11 to children and students without offending them and with sensitivity.  Honesty would be asking a lot.  The US suffered the destruction of two monumental buildings, crowded and symbolic, but there was a prelude.  Dresden was eradicated and major city centres like Cologne, Munich, Berlin were bombed beyond recognition, but it goes without saying that Germany waged no small amount of warfare themselves.  This makes sympathizing confusing at best, impossible at worst.  It’s easier for us decades later to forgive Germans, but not so for people who lived close to it.  In the words of Mordecai Richler in 1966, “Germany is still an abomination to me.”  People’s opinions of what provoked 9/11 seem to depend on their sympathies more than historical accuracy, but the case of Germany is considerably more clear cut.  Accordingly, I didn’t know how I would feel when I arrived in Berlin.

I heard Germany had changed a lot, but what exactly did that mean? Perhaps I’d only be spat on or beat up.  What would I think when I first laid eyes on some hulking blonde, blue eyed Aryan type?  Would I innocently ask him for directions, or wonder where his grandfather was during the war?  What might he be thinking?  Better not abuse this kike or he’ll tell some lawyer and there’ll be yet another stain on our national reputation.  Perhaps, but perhaps not.  This nice tourist looks lost. I didn’t want to believe the former, but I’d be lying to say it wasn’t somewhere in my head.  In any case, it didn’t stop me from going.

We met Dutch tourists who laughed when I told them the Bahn (subway) was cheap, as they never paid.  From that moment on neither did I.  Maybe it was out of financial self-interest, but Germans had extended this courtesy to Jews before and I convinced myself they owed me.

I toured the city by foot and saw the remarkably imposing Nazi architecture of the Luftwaffe’s former headquarters (our Scottish tour guide said ‘it’s still evil, home now to the tax revenue’); Kathedral Bebelplatz where Jewish books were burned; the unmarked plot of grass under which Hitler was buried (unmarked so neo-Nazis don’t make pilgrimages there…in fitting symbolism, residents bring their dogs to piss and crap on the grounds);  a massive sculptural installation consisting of six thousand stone tablets called “to the murdered Jews of Europe” located just metres besides their parliament; and many other testaments of the horrors that happened.  So how did I feel at the time?  I wasn’t angry, bitter, sad, or depressed.  I was fascinated and I was thirsty.  Whatever I felt about the past, I was positive the Germans wouldn’t do it again.

I got the overwhelming sense that German’s felt tormented by their history, but were absolutely determined to move ahead.  Hell, they were already moving beyond the Berlin wall, which fell during my lifetime.  Later in Munich, I spoke to some local kids over a Stein of some potent brew who, without knowing I was Jewish, volunteered their eagerness to leave Germany.  “Hitler ruined it for us…we are ashamed.”  My advice was not to let something out of their control ruin their lives…just don’t do it again.

One day I encountered the tall blonde German I feared.  He was a tour guide in Berlin’s Jewish Museum.  With conspicuous excitement he asked the group of German teenagers, “and vat is vun stereotype of ze Jews?”  Hands didn’t exactly shoot up.  Someone whispered inaudibly and the tour guide’s smile lit the room.  “Money lenders! Bankers! Good.  Do you know how zis came to be?  You see, Christians were forbidden from exchanging money vith interest, so ze Jews were forced to, you see?”  Maybe those Aryans aren’t so bad once you get to know them.  The innumerable Holocaust museums were as detailed and thorough as the Nazi’s own documentation—no coincidence.  There’ll never be too many museums and monuments, yet you couldn’t really expect Berlin to have more.  If the Germans can confront their history, so can anyone.  Yet it can be hard to attribute blame when both sides suffer, as Mordecai so poignantly put it on a visit to Dresden in 1978: “I vacillated between being upset by the bomb damage that was evidently wanton in some places and feeling that it was not enough.”  Frequently with worrying superficiality, people denounce or support decades of American foreign policy in one sentence, trivializing history and missing the point.

Unless there’s a breakthrough in medicine, 110 years from now everybody currently on earth will be dead—it’d be needlessly tragic for those who are alive to be killing because they’re embroiled over our problems.  If every country dealt as thoroughly and sincerely in their past as Germany, and was as resolved to move forward without being crippled by victimhood, the world would move on.  Upsetting Muslims and Americans is the only proper response when upsetting things have happened.

I went to Germany to learn about history and I did. Germany felt compelled to face their demons (as monstrous as they were), but they ambitiously built back their cities day and night.  It’s easy to play victim, and it’s hard to blame people for not getting over real grievances they’ve suffered, but it gets you nowhere and it halts all progress.  I should have paid a couple Euros to ride German trains.

The Mordecai Richler quotes were excerpted from:

Shovelling Trouble, “the Holocaust and After.”

Belling the Cat “Germany 1978.”

Toronto’s Latest Snafu: Fords Frontin’ on the Waterfront

09 Friday Sep 2011

Posted by jdhalperin in Politics

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Enzo Dimatteo, National Post, Now Magazine, Rob Ford, Rob Mackenzie, the Globe and Mail, Toronto Standard, Toronto Waterfront

Depending on your perspective, the Mayor Fords are modern day Medicis, visionaries about to lavish our city’s waterfront in historical splendour, or their corruption and short-sightedness will replace moderate gains with an irreversible blight.  I just want trees and sand, but their plans are larger.

In Wednesday’s issue of the National Post, Natalie Alcoba relays the highlights of the redesigned Ford waterfront: a sports complex in a decommissioned power plant, high-rises, hotels, a “retail-leisure town centre destination” (which is apparently not a mall), an “ice palace” (skating rink), a monorail, and for good measure a Ferris wheel. Oh, and an extended parkland/harbour jutting into Lake Ontario made from the earth burrowed under the Eglinton LRT.  “This is an opportunity for Canada and Toronto to redefine a 21st century waterfront for the world,” said Eric Kuhne, the architect who drew the initial sketches. And he should know–no slouch, he’s completed major waterfront designs on five continents. Perhaps only in this modern, Google age rife with plagiarism redefining our world constitutes installing Dubai’s harbour, London’s “Eye”, and Springfield’s monorail. “This is a plan that will create jobs,” Doug Ford said in response to the old plan that was to emerge from the ground of its own volition.

Kelly McParland knocked the current (previous?) route of development in Thursday’s National Post: “in a decade of existence it has spent $900 million on what still strikes the untrained eye as a dusty stretch of parking lots, industrial sites, and kitschy tourist outlets.” Fords say the 25 years allotted to this development is too slow, they can do theirs in 10.  What’s not to like? To hear the National Post, we should have started building yesterday.

Well, others have seen more than McParland’s “untrained eye.”  Edward Keenan of the Grid attributes the slow pace of development to the fact that the environmental assessment, required by law, was just recently completed.  It took years and cost $19 million.  A new plan will require another lengthy, costly assessment.  That’s bad, but Keenan gets to hotter stuff: “research by York University professor Robert MacDermid shows a link between one developer who owns a 50-year lease on Port Lands property discussed in the plan and $30,000 in donations to Rob Ford’s mayoral campaign.”  Corruption! Insider deals! Sexy.  Ford’s freely admit they don’t have money, and to fund this thing they’d need to borrow against the increased land value.  In other words, Toronto would sell undeveloped land to a private firm at low rates before the development takes place. Keenan estimates the losses could be in the billions and compares it to selling off the Distillery District before it became the Distillery.

Enzo Dimatteo of Now, the city’s most rabid Ford basher, is dubious, to put it politely.  Dimatteo reports that Doug Ford sat in on the recorded meeting of the Toronto Port Lands Company board where the decision was made to sole-source preliminary drawings for the revised plan.  Taking Now seriously isn’t easy.  This alleged “paper” has such low esteem for truth that the “pictures,” even the covers, are merely photo shopped assaults, and for this I wrote them saying I don’t even trust the veracity of their concert listings.  But they’re far from alone in finding something shady.

Rob Mackenzie of the Toronto Standard pointed out that Fords failed to consult with the councillor under whose land it lies, and that they hired Kuhne three months ago even though developing that land is in another agency’s mandate, Waterfront Toronto.  Mackenzie cites more abuses of procedure and voices doubts about the project’s practicality.  In stark contrast, David Dick-Agnew, also from the Toronto Standard, invokes comparisons of New York’s Central Park and Paris’ Champs Elysees.  Sure…New York and Paris will be obsolete when Fords are done. The Globe and Mail’s John Loring mentions an additional quarter billion needed to naturalize the mouth of the Don River to prepare a flood plain in the event of a hurricane the magnitude of Hazel. Keep the sober calculation coming.

Under the polarizing reign of the Fords, the shocking and bizarre appear inexhaustible. Just how good or horrible this gets, or even whether it’s legal, remains to be seen, but it’s doubtful their plan will materialize in full. Despite the talk of Ferris wheels and ice palaces, the Fords are immune to both fun and culture. This is about high rises and shopping. If something needs to be sacrificed for this plan to work…

In any case, expressed in only his characteristic, lucid terms, Rob is determined for a showdown: “…We’re going to go out, we’re going to consult, but this is step one…It’s a proven fact, we’re moving the ball down field; we’re getting things done and we’re going to make this just like a gold mine.”

Sidney Crosby, Head Shots, and HBO

07 Wednesday Sep 2011

Posted by jdhalperin in Sports, Statements

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

concussions, Gary Bettman, HBO, headshots, KHL, Sidney Crosby

Crosby’s announcement today that he will not start the 2012 season is seriously worrying for hockey fans all over.  Nobody’s sure exactly what to do about these injuries, but there’s never been so much pressure to address violence in the sport.  Fans, NHL execs/players/managers, nor media know where to draw the line between abhorrent and traditional violence in hockey.  How much savagery is too much?  Years ago, a young female fan was struck by a puck and killed before mesh was implemented above the glass behind the nets.  Last year, head hits were all the rage, dispensing and condemning them, even before Crosby was struck down.  But it was especially ominous that the NHL’s marquee player was victimized during the climax of HBO’s all access documentary of the “Winter Classic,” the outdoor game.  To be sure, he played again but was reinjured four days later and hasn’t played since.  Allowing HBO this kind of access to two of the most exciting teams was terrific entertainment value, and more importantly it recorded for posterity an unfettered slice of life in the NHL, on and off the ice.  Fans would kill to get this kind of footage of the immortals like Wayne, Orr, Lemieux, or Sundin.  The irony is the NHL’s wise decision to document their two star players in their prime actually preserved and highlighted the league’s embarrassing inability to protect their players.

It would have been hard for the NHL to live it down if Crosby’s career was never the same after this point, but that the tragedy was filmed in an attempt to showcase, with unprecedented access and budget, the humanity behind the league’s best players is a cruel irony.  Crosby’s success before the injury was hard to describe.  Gretzky, Lemiuex, Bossy, Orr, Crosby.  That may seem like high company, but that is the current order of all-time points per game, only Crosby was twenty three and seemed to be just finding his stride. After winning absolutely everything, he was on pace for his best season.  To put the gap between he and Ovechkin in perspective, Crosby missed half the season and Ovie missed only three yet they tied for goals.  If this unabashed goonery continues and it turns out Crosby’s career was ruined during the filming of the NHL’s most industrious marketing effort, Bettman and Co. might as well declare their tolerance for barbarity from a loudspeaker to the American market he’s so eager to woo.  At that point, it’ll be apparent that a little girl needs to die before this league is sufficiently shamed into doing something.

At least Crosby is no longer getting hell for whining to the refs.

Post Script: I wrote this a while ago but published today because of Crosby’s announcement.  I certainly did not mean to give disproportionate attention to a concussed player, however good at hockey, the day a plane crashed killed 43 KHL players and coaches.  The shocking tragedy is unfolding yet and there’ll be commentary to come. In the meantime, RIP.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Twitter

Follow @JDhalperin
Tweet

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,022 other subscribers

Essential sites

  • Grateful Dead Chords/Tabs
  • Neil Young Chords/Tabs

My Writing

  • Huffington Post
  • Maclean's
  • Music Writing
  • The Star
  • the Walrus Laughs
  • Toronto Review of Books
  • Toronto Standard
  • World Is One News

Topics

  • Comedy (18)
  • Literature (13)
  • Politics (28)
  • Sports (16)
  • Statements (36)
  • Uncategorized (44)

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Jeff Halperin
    • Join 52 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Jeff Halperin
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar